Italian Horror Blogathon: Cannibal Apocalypse (aka Apocalypse domani)

Released a year after Cannibal Holocaust and a year before Cannibal Ferox (Jess Franco’s Cannibals was in there, too) it’s safe to say that the‘70s and early ‘80s belonged to the cannibal subgenre. Antonio Margheriti – working under the oft-used pseudonym Anthony Dawson – never had much use for the horror genre as this was his only foray into visceral, exploitation horror film. He was more of a Gothic horror filmmaker with one of his most well known films being the 1964 film Castle of Blood (It's also much rumored that he directed Andy Warhol's Frankenstein and not Paul Morrisey). He was more of a genre filmmaker who specialized in those great Italian action films that were just knockoffs of more popular American films. Marghertiti – who cut his teeth working as an assistant with Sergio Leone – isn’t up to the tricks that Deodato and Lenzi used in their cannibal films; in fact, the word ‘cannibal’ in the title is a bit of misnomer as Cannibal Apocalypse doesn’t contain any of the racial insensitivity or cruelty to animals (or gut munching) that those infamous cannibal film have. It’s a nice, underrated film, and one that I am completely baffled by the DPP’s inclusion of it on their Video Nasty list.  Cannibal Apocalypse is an interesting amalgam of cannibal movie, Vietnam movie (its Italian title translates to “Apocalypse Tomorrow”), and Euro crime picture; it’s a sneaky-good Italian horror movie that more people need to see.  

Read More

2 comments

Blog Alert! Check it out...

Dear readers I have an announcement to make. I'm a papa! Okay...not really, but my brother is (he and his wife just got the final thumbs up a week ago from the adoption agency they were looking into in China...so I'm going to be an Uncle!)...but really that doesn't compare to the news I have today. My brother, author of the wonderfully irreverent Elusive as Robert Denby, and I have started a new blog called It's Garbage Day! (Kudos to those of you you can spot the reference), and beginning tomorrow we will have our first post up. We've blatantly ripped off the idea of a "conversations" (ahem sorry Ed and Jason) piece for all the movies we will discuss...which, in case you couldn't tell, will most likely be bad movies. However, we don't want to bore anyone with conversations about bad movies...no these are bad movies that say something. You will not want to miss our conversation on Neil Labute's The Wicker Man.

This blog also gives me an outlet to talk more about bad, or just so-so, horror movies. I don't really like writing "reviews" for them, and since I owe much of my horror knowledge to my brother, I figured a better avenue for that type of discourse would be on another blog where he and I share writing duties.

I hope you'll join us tomorrow at It's Garbage Day! for our first conversation (I'll leave you in suspense as to what it is we're talking about)...it's going to be a good one. Of course, the reason I am telling you all this and pimping the blog on here is that I want all of you (especially you horror buffs...there's going to be a lot of horror and 70's B-movie conversations that'll cover everything from Alienator to Malone starring Burt Reynolds to some of our favorite Italian hacks like Umberto Lenzi...and of course the films of John Saxon), my dear and faithful readers, to stop by and follow the blog if you think it's worth your time. We'd love to have these conversations with everyone, not just each other...because quite honestly we talk about this stuff every time we see each other (and our friends just roll their eyes).

So I hope I'll see you all tomorrow at the new blog...which in no way will take away from this blog -- hopefully it'll add to it and make me a better writer.

See ya!

Read More

12 comments

Lazy Blogger Repost: Freddy Kreuger and Postmodernism -- Thoughts on Wes Craven's New Nightmare

This re-post of an essay I wrote last year is an attempt to release content that some of you may not have read. It's also a way for me to continue to refine my poor writing and find ways to post content in my as-of-right-now hectic life of juggling work, grad school, and wedding stuff. So in the next month or so (the wedding is in August) I will sprinkle old material (with some touch-ups) with some new (I still have two more "forgotten gems" of 1999 to do, then it's onto the top 10). So look for the usual output of material on here, some of it may be re-done older stuff, and some may be fresh thoughts, but my hope is that it will all be new to you (read: I have a lot more readers now than I did a year ago). I hope you enjoy my laziness.


Wes Craven has always been one of the most influential, and sometimes creative, forces working within the horror genre. His films The Last House on the Left (which coined the popular phrase “just keep repeating, it’s only a movie” in its trailer) and the equally-revered cult classic The Hills Have Eyes have both created the blueprint for the barrage of torture porn films released within the last five years (The Hills Have Eyes was remade with little inspiration or panache). I don’t much care for either film – although the latter is far superior to the overrated Last House on the Left). He resuscitated the near-dead genre in the 90’s (an altogether forgettable decade for horror films, save a few films) with his 1996 hit Scream (a lot of his previous films were dead on arrival themselves, so he was a culprit just as much as he was responsible for giving it new life), but in 1984 he created a town, a character, and a famous street that would change the landscape of 1980’s American horror films and would cement Craven as one of the premier American horror filmmakers.

Craven’s contributions to the genre are surprisingly lost on new horror fans. He made the aforementioned cult classics in the late 70’s and early 80’s and then made some not so great career moves when he directed films like Swamp Thing, The Hills Have Eyes II, The Serpent and the Rainbow (his attempt at Cannibal Feroux, perhaps), Shocker, the completely forgettable A Vampire in Brooklyn, Cursed, and in one of the oddest career choices I've seen (almost as weird as Sam Raimi directing For Love of the Game or David Lynch directing The Straight Story) he completely stepped outside of the genre to make a PG rated drama starring Meryl Streep. There is an interesting film that lies in between his clunkers like Shocker and A Vampire in Brooklyn, and is a good indicator of where he was heading with Scream. This film is his postmodern re-imagining of Freddy Kreuger simply titles New Nightmare. Breathing new life into a stale character – much in the same way Craven breathed new life into a stale genre – Craven stripped away all of the signifiers his most famous character was recognized by and returned Kreuger to what he was originally mean to be: a signifier of evil. Best summed up: Craven goes back to the boogeyman approach with Krueger; he is like the ‘bad guy’ in every fairy-tale we read growing up. Wes Craven’s New Nightmare is a direct result of what New Line Cinema did to Freddy Kreuger, transforming him from an evil child killer into a wise-cracking pop culture icon; a caricature of what Craven intended for him to be.

It had been a long time since I had last seen New Nightmare, and not only does the film still hold up as one of the benchmark horror films, I actually find it more clever and creepier than the original film. The original Nightmare film was great because it blurred the lines of reality and dream; it was unsettling, and you were never quite comfortable watching the film because you knew the second something looked askew bad things were going to happen. The original film is patient, not a slice and dice slasher film, but rather it revels in its creepy ambience (the school, the boiler room, the Thompson’s house, the fog on Elm Street, etc) and takes its time with the scares, which come off as genuine instead of the usual contrived scare moments of 80’s slasher films. It was also one of the first horror films to use state of the art (for the time) special effects, creating some iconic horror imagery like Freddy and the latex wall, and the rotating room that was used to create one of the more eerie scenes of the film when Tina is brutally murdered. Craven had a great idea for a film, and in fact he never wanted the film to have so many sequels; however, New Line couldn’t resist as the fans turned Freddy into a pop culture icon – so five sequels followed with only the second sequel entitled Dream Warriors having Craven’s name on it (he co-wrote it), and starring both John Saxon (!) and Heather Langenkamp from the original (also it was directed by Chuck Russell of The Mask fame and was co-written by Frank Darabont who did Shawshank and The Mist, so the film had talent working on it).

In 1994 I have no doubt that Craven saw his career was floundering with some of the films he was making, so he wisely decided to go back to his most famous film and his most famous character to try and resurrect his career. The result was one of the first (Tenebre also did this…and oddly enough, also starred John Saxon) postmodern horror films that was not only self reflexive, but a clear indicator that Craven wasn’t about to let the horror genre die (which it was doing); by recreating the creepy atmosphere from the 1984 film, and again bluring the lines of what Jean Baudrillard called “hyper reality”, Craven constructed a film that was smart and clever and really quite original for the horror genre. Craven also showed that the film should be taken seriously as a horror film by removing the tongue from inside Freddy’s cheek; which made the audience fear him like they did ten years earlier. There is even a clever jab at New Line for what they turned Freddy into when Heather Langenkamp is doing an interview for a television show, and Robert Englund comes out in his Freddy outfit and the studio audience, donned with Freddy masks and signs extolling the character, goes crazy, showering him with love and adoration.

The film takes place in Los Angeles primarily at the home of Heather Langenkamp, the actress who played Nancy Thompson, and on the studio lot where the iconic glove of claws Freddy wielded is being revamped and updated to look more nineties. The opening of the film is an allusion to the opening of the original, and right away Craven is using this self reflexive language to make a clear distinction that the film recognizes that these are effects and characters, but it doesn’t lessen the horror, because they are still going to protrude your senses and create images that stick with you. This Nightmare film is not so much about Freddy Kreuger, but a commentary about how horror affects those who work within the genre, and the fans who love it so much (so much that they allow their children to watch it, a theme that is explicated by Craven as we see Heather’s reluctance to usher her son into the films world).

There are a lot of earthquakes in Los Angeles, and Heather is starting to have some unsettling nightmares about Freddy Kreuger. These of course are dismissed by her friends and co-stars as nothing more than stress from work and the earthquakes, and a stalker who is making obscene phone calls (Craven even brings back the famous phone scene where the receiver turns into Freddy’s mouth and he ‘tongues’ Heather). Of course none of these issues compare to the fact that her son Dylan is having horrifying night terrors and sleep walking while speaking in a weird Freddy-esque voice. From this point on the film assumes the role of fairy-tale as the motif of the bread crumbs and finding their way back home is established…and away we go into the weird world of Wes Craven. The Hansel and Gretel motif is taken one step further as the end of the film takes place in a furnace and Freddy proclaims to Dylan that he's going to eat him up.

When Heather reports to Wes Craven and Robert Englund about these weird dreams, she gets a strange response from Robert (who later flees L.A.) and Wes tells her that its time to make another film because he’s been having “those dreams again.” Craven’s dreams are the inspiration for his films, so we are told, and Heather wants to know what happens. It is in this scene that Craven explains the theory that perhaps because they killed Freddy, he is like the genie in the bottle, and what was keeping him occupied and trapped is no longer around (i.e. they stopped making the films) therefore he has been released and broken the fourth wall; he is now a part of their reality until they can find a way to trap him again. The otherworldliness (read: postmodern themes) of the film really escalates at this point as Heather slowly transforms into her character Nancy, and in a truly inspired scene asks for the help of co-star John Saxon to help with Dylan (who just had an episode). When they walk outside to talk things over he begins to call her Nancy, at this point Heather realizes what is happening and by not calling him John, but Dad, she makes the necessary leap across the threshold of reality into the realm of fairy-tale. The way Craven handles the seamless ping-ponging of reality and dream is a masterful stroke that really adds an original element to a film series that had been watered down by five sequels.

I don’t ever recall being that scared by the Nightmare films, they are creepy more so than anything else – especially the scene in New Nightmare where Heather sees Dylan being pulled into the coffin of her dead husband, Dylan's father, by Freddy – but what’s interesting about New Nightmare is that the film does everything that Scream does, only better. I can only assume that this film (which made a mere 18 million at the box office) was not that successful because either: fans wanted the sardonic Freddy Kreuger and got the evil one instead, or perhaps, because there were no smart ass jokes delivered by Jaime Kennedy and Matthew Lillard to ease the tension of the film. For whatever reason New Nightmare is often overlooked by fans of the genre who look at the film Craven made two years later as being responsible for the resurgence of the genre; however, Craven introduced the postmodern theme of self-reflexivity two years earlier in a much better film (and I thought Scream was pretty clever, but it’s nothing compared to New Nightmare). Now there are probably countless films that can be considered all of these things before New Nightmare was made, but I am speaking specifically about the horror genre here, and it has to be noted that what Craven did was deconstruct the genre and turn something that was stale, that had become a caricature, a parody of itself, and made it fresh and alive and even (gasp!) scary. New Nightmare is not only a funny inside joke for fans of the original film, it’s not only a clever meta-horror film, but I think it deserves to be in the conversation as one of the great horror films made in the last 30 years.

Craven has always tried to tie this cleverness and awareness into his films, and he was doing something with an old product that other horror directors wouldn’t dream of. While John Carpenter was essentially making the same movie over and over (ugh, Vampires and Ghosts of Mars anyone?), Craven decided to see what it would be like for the viewer to consider Freddy Kreuger as an evil and scary character like they did ten years ago. By dressing Kreuger in a black trench coat and black fedora, he is stripping this iconic character of his most famous signifier – and in the process, doing something very postmodern and intelligent for a horror film – Freddy no longer has his red and black striped sweater or dirty old hat, no this is a new imagining of Freddy Kreuger: a perverse evil that not only has intruded upon our dreams, but now is evident in real life. Kudos to Craven for thinking outside of the box and finding an intelligent and original way to reinvent his most profitable monster; and as if showing Robert Englund playing Freddy Kreuger as rock star (the television show scene) wasn’t enough proof that the fourth wall had been broken, Craven gets one last wink in as the film closes and the credits role and we see: Freddy Kreuger as Himself.

New Nightmare is undoubtedly one of the finest horror films Craven has made, and it’s proof that the genre, once again, desperately needs him. His recent thriller Red Eye was harmless enough, but the genre, although not suffering financially, is beginning to look a lot like the early 90’s these days. Every horror film released in the last 10 years looks the same (Damn you Michael Bay for producing the TCM remake), tries for the same thing (ugh torture porn…damn you Quentin Tarantino for producing Hostel), and has the same snarky, nihilistic attitude towards its audience (anyone remember Chaos or how about the recent The Strangers? The former indebted to Craven's Last House on the Left, and the latter owes much to The Hills Have Eyes). Unless your name is Neil Marshall (and even he’s not above being responsible as his follow up to The Descent, Doomsday, was bollocks) the future of the genre looks bleak. Sam Raimi gave us a guest appearance this year with the fabulous Drag Me to Hell – and in a way was doing today what Craven did with New Nightmare as Raimi’s film was essentially a re-working of his best ideas from The Evil Dead films. It’s apparent: the genre needs Wes Craven again (I'm assuming for now that this was a one-time deal for Raimi). I haven’t always liked what he’s done, but he’s proven each decade that he has the right formula for pumping new life into an almost-dead genre. New Nightmare is proof that Craven is the man for the job.

Read More

9 comments

Halloween Week 2008: A Nightmare on Elm Street 3

When Wes Craven was lured back to write this third installment in the Nightmare franchise, he was reluctant to do so since he never intended for his original film to spawn a string of (mediocre) sequels. He agreed to write the script as long as he could approach a taboo topic that intrigued him: suicide. Much like the original Nightmare Craven got his idea for the third film through reading articles about teenagers being so scared in their sleep that they would commit suicide in a state where it wasn't known whether or not they were awake. This idea intrigued Craven as well as the thought of bringing Freddy back to kill him off and to remove the bad taste the second film of the series left in the fans mouth. The result: a pretty good horror movie that is not a complete waste of your time.

Of course the minute the film opens and you see five different names of screenwriters on the screen, you know that they butchered Craven's original script; they did indeed do that, you can check out the original script online. In the original script Freddy was menacing and didn't talk much (like the original) and was more vulgar and scarier. Nancy (Heather Langenkamp) wasn't a medical expert on sleep or anything like that, she was looking for her missing father (John Saxon!), the last man to know where Freddy's body is buried. Also, there was no sub plot with the doctor of the hospital (where all the kids are having the same nightmares) encounters a ghost nun who just happens to be named Amanda Kreuger, Freddy's mom.

So yeah, the film is interesting for the reason alone that you can see elements of the original version Craven had in mind, but sadly the studio didn't go all the way with it, afraid that no one would want to pay money to such a serious subject broached in a horror film. Craven has always been a pioneer of getting these more serious subtexts into his films and then using the horror genre to explicate them further, but not here as it's kind of surprising that New Line, a studio notorious with taking chances, played it so safe with this one.

The quick and dirty version of the story: teenagers are having nightmares and Freddy is killing them in the real world through their dreams. Nancy returns to help the kids make sense of what's happening. Instead of each teenager having a dream and dying, Craven did something interesting with this one and had them all inhabit the same nightmare. While in their nightmare the kids could be anything they wanted to be, since it was their dream, thus giving them super powers (one kids is really strong, one is a wizard, one a punk rock chick with switch blades, etc.). So yeah, that's pretty much the plot....you're basic Nightmare storyline.

Still you get some great, weird moments that are synonymous with the Nightmare franchise. For instance the scene where Freddy turns into a giant worm like creature and starts to swallow Kristen (played by a young Patricia Arquette). Also, the deaths are as inventive as ever and the special effects are pretty good for the time, and the low budget director Chuck Russel was working with. Another interesting thing about the film is that it's the last entry in the series where Freddy is always joking and making awful puns as he kills people. It wasn't until Craven would come back to the franchise with New Nightmare that Freddy would be this quiet and this menacing.

The last watchable thing about this film is the amount of talent it had working on it. Frank Darabont (Shawshank Redemption, The Mist) re-wrote the screenplay, Chuck Russel (The Mask, Eraser) directed, and the film stars Patrica Arquette, Laurence Fishbourne, and of course John Saxon (who has a tremendous scene of overacting and pure scene chewing where he's in a bar drinking, slowly, and delivering his lines even slower).

I always remember being really scared by this movie when I was a kid. It had one of those memorable cover boxes that looked really cool with all the teens and their "special powers" , and then on the back the creepy image of Freddy as the worm swallowing Arquette. I could never get that image out of my head as it would cause me to have nightmares. Well, many, many years later I can say that the film isn't that scary. Even though there is nothing really scary about the film, it's a fun addition to your Halloween to-do list if you've never seen this installment. It has a good cast, talent working behind the scenes, and even a cameo from Dick Cavett! Oh, and Dokken sings the theme song. Yes....there's reason to see it right there.

A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors is playing the rest of the month on the Independent Film Channel.

Read More

1 comment