John Carpenter: Dark Star
Dark Star is the
very definition of a seminal film. It predates things audiences would later
associate with more popular, bigger budget science-fiction films like Alien and Blade Runner, yes, but one can also see the seeds of the themes
prominent throughout the rest of Carpenter’s work. There’s really no need for a
Paul Harvey-esque “and now you know the rest of the story” introduction here;
the names John Carpenter and Dan O’Bannon need no context for fans of the
horror/sci-fi genre. So, I’ll keep this short: we know that Carpenter went to
USC film school, won an Academy Award in 1970 for his short film (the western The Resurrection of Broncho Billy), and
then hooked up with fellow-student O’Bannon to create Dark Star as an experimental student film. Based on what producers had seen, they wanted Carpenter and O'Bannon to expand the film to the length of a feature, upping the budget to $60,000, but also significantly upping the stress levels for Carpenter and O'Bannon, for now they had to stretch their original idea to feature length. We also know that O’Bannon would later
use his experiences writing Dark Star as
a test for what would later be his biggest hit, and one of the biggest
science-fiction films ever made, Alien.
Yes, Dark Star is an amazing story of
small-budget filmmakers making so much out of so little. Yes, it’s a seminal experimental film that looks more elegant
despite the fact that it was made for mere peanuts. But to label the film as nothing
more than a low-budget, experimental genre flick is to miss the point entirely.
Everyone likes to point to Dark Star as
the catalyst for two careers that are forever tied to the science-fiction and
horror subgenres, but what is often overlooked is just how damn funny and
earnestly committed Dark Star is to
its wacky, batshit insane premise. I know that we all like to label Carpenter
the “master of horror” or the “master of science-fiction,” but he’s also
really, really funny, as evinced by his debut film.
John Carpenter described his debut film, Dark Star, as “Waiting for Godot in space.” Indeed the irreverent comedy/sci-fi
hybrid is all about a bunch of dudes sitting around, waiting to blow up
planets. Since they are in space, there is a nothingness surrounding them that
they try to combat with daily routines (my favorite being the feeding of the
on-ship alien, a giant beachball with claws) that try to alleviate the eerie
silence and nothingness of space from pervading the ship. As the ship’s crew — Lt.
Doolittle (Brian Narelle), Sgt. Pinback (screenwriter O'Bannon), Boiler (Cal
Kuniholm), and Talby (Dre Pahich) — awaits orders for the next “unstable” planet
to blow up, they sit around and go about their daily routines as the tedium
drives each of them to the brink of sanity.
Pinback (by far the most memorable
and popular character) feeds the beachball alien and keeps a bizarre video diary that is obviously meant to satirize Captain Kirk's logs, Talby
simply sits up in the observation deck and looks out at the stars, Boiler
prefers shooting things up with the on-board laser, Doolittle (my favorite)
pines for the days when he surfed, and then there’s their frozen commander
Powell (Joe Saunders), who is being kept alive in a giant block of ice. When the crew of the Dark Star runs into some problems with
their computers malfunctioning and said malfunction causes a bomb to think
that it needs to detonate sooner than it should, Dark Star really begins to be more than just an interestingly
curious, oddball sci-fi flick; it becomes an extremely assured satire and absurdist comedy.
Dark Star has a
lot of fun with its premise. Some of the film’s most famous scenes can be found
in later, more popular science-fiction films. Probably the film’s most famous
moment can be seen in Ridley Scott’s Alien
and, to some degree, the James Cameron sequel. Pinback’s pursuit of the
beachball alien runs the gamut of the ship and takes up most of the middle
portion of the film. It’s amazing what Carpenter does with his camera, creating
depth to make the ship look bigger than it is. When Pinback is almost killed
numerous times, Carpenter does a great job of creating space within the frame
to make the shoe-string constructed sets look more elegant than they really are
(a staple, really, of Carpenter’s work). Some of the film’s best and most hilarious absurdist moments come
when the crew members engage in philosophical discussion with the bomb (an obvious riff on the opposite-in-tone Kubrick classic 2001: A Space Odyssey), have
causal conversation as they float out in the nothingness of space towards their doom (the ambivalent conversation between Doolittle and Talby always gets me), or (my
favorite) when Doolittle finally does get to fulfill his yen for surfing (a
hilarious sight gag, to be sure).
Dark Star's satirical tone was a nice alternative to some of the super-serious science fiction films of its era, and when you think about the film in the context of its release, Carpenter and co. seem to be saying something about how boredom breeds contempt; contempt for one's job and contempt towards others in the group. Think about the moment when Pinback lets the rest of the crew know that he's not really Pinback, but someone else that has taken Pinback's name; the rest of the crew is indifferent. Some forget the names of their fellow crew members, and when they ask for the name of that crew member, they're met with an absurd response like, "what's my name?" Despite the close quarters of the Dark Star, this small group of astronaut slackers is no tight-knit group of brothers; they're just as distant and detached in that cramped space as the planets they're blowing up are from Earth.
A lot of what we will come to recognize as John Carpenter
traits can be found in Dark Star. To
be more specific: one can see the beginnings of Howard Hawks’ influence on
Carpenter and how it would seep into his subsequent films. Carpenter’s admiration
for Hawks stems from the old master’s attention to narrative details, the
characters (I’ve heard Carpenter mention numerous times in interviews about how
it was the attention Hawks paid to the little details involving his characters,
especially how they interact and trade props, that really stuck with him), his
"invisible" camera (the way he isn't showy with his style), and the
way he did this all within the studio system and did in a number of genres. One
bit of influence in particular that seemed to stick with Carpenter, and is
apparent in Dark Star, is the
Hawksian trait of making movies about a group of people under duress and how
they function under that pressure (this would come out more overtly in his next
film, Assault on Precinct 13, specifically
in how the film is an obvious homage to Hawks’ Rio Bravo). Hawks’ influence is something we’ll return to again and
again throughout this retrospective as Carpenter is clearly in love with the deceivingly
simple approach to filmmaking we associate with the American auteur.
To a lesser extent, we also see the influence that EC Comics
had on Carpenter. With Dark Star, we
see the same approach to subversive social commentary that EC Comics employed,
often using science-fiction as the surface-level story (a kind of distraction
from the “real” stuff) while other more sophisticated — often political or
philosophical — material lurked beneath the genre trappings. Obviously in
subsequent Carpenter films like The Thing
and They Live and Escape from New York we see this particular
influence more clearly than we do in Dark
Star, but it’s an important influence to take note of as we begin this
retrospective.
In the grand scheme of this retrospective, I doubt I’ll come
to the conclusion that Dark Star is
one of Carpenter’s best films (the director himself has distanced himself from
it, calling it a not-so-good film), but there’s something to be said about the
energy and earnestness surrounding the film’s absurdist elements. This is an
assured debut, no doubt, showing a filmmaker already in complete control of
their vision (I haven’t even mentioned Carpenter’s contributions as composer, and
that certainly becomes important with
subsequent films…like, you know, creating one of the most recognizable,
haunting scores in the history of horror), and that’s enough right there to get
someone’s attention. These first-time features don’t always exhibit a director starting
out on such solid ground — so assured of who they are as a director and what
they want their film to be — but for Carpenter, Dark Star clearly portends a successful career. Oh, maybe not
always financially so (Carpenter didn’t have much success making movies for the
studio system) but certainly in the way he successfully finds himself as a
filmmaker, much like his idol Hawks, that is in complete control over his film —
actors, script, music — and that when one sees a John Carpenter picture, it is
easily identifiable as a John Carpenter picture.
What an excellent start to this retrospective. You really nailed what makes this film so special. Sure, it is rough around the edges and has all the hallmarks of a debut feature film but it already has Carpenter's stamp on it. In retrospect, we can see how it led to his subsequent films.
ReplyDeleteI haven't watched this film in ages and your review really makes me want to check it out again.
Thanks, J.D.! I appreciate the kind words. The more I think about the fact that what we know as the "Carpenter stamp" is so evident in this film, the more impressed I am by that fact. To pull that off with such a low-budget debut shows what a talent he is. He's not the flashiest filmmaker (again, this is often how we take notice of great filmmakers, no?), but he's in complete control here.
DeleteDark Star is one of my favorite movies of all time, I find it funny and I truly believe that it's one of the best films Carpenter has ever done, it's a nice mix and truly something that has never been attempted again, it's unique and I've never seen something like it. I love it.
ReplyDeleteI think what keeps Dark Star fresh even today is just how unique it is. I love the earnestness behind the film's absurd moments; I think that is one of the big reasons the film -- even though Carpenter doesn't think it's a good film -- still holds up today. I don't know if I like it as much as you do, Jaime, but I don't think I'm too far behind your enthusiasm. It's in that second tier of Carpenter films for me.
DeleteNice work and it has way too long since I have visited this flick. Maybe time to pony up for the $15 blu ray and see how great that beach ball looks in hi-def!
ReplyDelete