Showing posts with label Joe D'Amato. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe D'Amato. Show all posts

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Italian Horror Blogathon: What Have You Done to Solange? (aka Cosa avete fatto a Solange?, Terror in the Woods, The School that Couldn't Scream, The Secret of the Green Pins)

What-Have-You-Done-to-Solange-Italian-Poster
I think of Italian horror in stages: you have your Gothic stuff from Bava, you have your ethereal horror a la Suspiria, you have your cannibal subgenre, you have your cheap knockoffs of popular American films, you have your zombies, and you have your gialli. It is this later category that Italy is most known for. Sure, anti-narrative fare like the Lucio Fulci’s The Beyond is what stands out the most to fans, but it is those early gialli — with their whodunit, Edgar Wallace-esque narratives and block-gloved killers — that most people think of when the topic of Italian horror comes up. The sheer volume of titles that continue to be unearthed, cleaned up on DVD, and presented to American audiences is staggering. There are still so many gialli that I’ve never even heard of that I continue to come across every year I do this blogathon. These films have a higher percentage of being terrible because if the mystery isn’t engaging, there usually isn’t a whole lot about the film’s aesthetic that engages me. Whereas with a film like City of the Living Dead, for example, may confound me and even make me laugh at how silly it all is — but damn does it look great in stretches. This is not always so with a giallo — where if the narrative is a slog, then the entire film is usually a slog because there usually just isn’t anything too pretty to look at (unless, of course, you’re Mario Bava) to distract you from how boring the film is.

All of this is to say that when Dario Argento burst on the scene in 1970 with the release of The Bird with the Crystal Plumage, there was a bit of resurgence for the giallo — a subgenre that dominated Italian horror for much of the ‘60s. It would only last until Argento (and American horror films like The Exorcist that were hugely popular in Italy) changed the game years later with Suspiria. All of this is to say (and here I am nearly two paragraphs in, and I haven't even mentioned the title of the movie I'm talking about yet) that when I popped in Massimo Dallamano's What Have You Done to Solange? for this blogathon, I was absolutely floored by how into it I was. It's one of the better gialli I've seen.

I'll make the plot synopsis brief since (even though the film is 40 years old) nobody wants a good mystery ruined for them. The film opens with a man and a woman makin' whoopee in a rowboat. The man in question is Enrico Rossini (Fabio Testi, who later starred in Fulci's Contraband and other poliziotteschi), an Italian gymnastics instructor who has moved to London, with his German wife, to teach at an elite Catholic girls school. His wife, Herta (Karin Baal), is also a teacher at the school, but alas, it is not her who is in the rowboat with Enrico...that rapscallion. Italian stereotypes aside, Enrico is the youngest teacher at the school and the girls love him. Some are even in love with him, and Enrico, never one to disappoint his students, begins an affair with Elizabeth (Christina Galbo), an 18 year-old senior whose family is very prominent in the community.  

So, back to the rowboat: Enrico and Elizabeth are necking in the rowboat when Elizabeth swears that she has seen an heinous action on the riverbank. This ruins the mood (Enrico isn't convinced and thinks she's just trying to play defense against him) and acts as the catalyst for our mystery as the next morning Enrico reads the newspaper, learning that there was indeed a murder in that location the day before. Even more worrisome to Enrico is that the victim was a fellow student of Elizabeth's. What makes the mystery so intriguing at first is that it's a balancing act between Elizabeth's vision and Enrico trying to hide his infidelity when the police come snooping around the school.

Naturally Enrico doesn't want his affair with a student to get out, considering it could ruin the school's reputation and his marriage. But when more students end up dead (the method of which, a knife through their vagina, is rather gruesome), Enrico has to give in even though he maintains that the information he has, and what little Elizabeth actually saw, can't really help the police with their investigation. In typical giallo/Krimi fashion, Enrico fears that the investigation is focusing too much on him and not trying to find the real killer, so he takes matters into his own hands and begins investigating the murders. This "everyman as police investigator" is a required element in these kind of films, and even though most gialli have convoluted mysteries with huge plot holes, Solange is surprisingly adept. Enrico's investigation leads him to the truth  before the police, natch (with one of those wonderful bits of exposition found in almost all gialli where he says, "the revenge he planned was symbolically obvious..." while gathered with the police around the dead body of the killer), but the reveal of the film's central mystery is at once horrifying and surprisingly poignant.

Solange's director, Massimo Dallamano, was most known for his work as DP on Leone’s A Fistful of Dollars and For a Few Dollars More. The only film of his I was familiar with prior to this film was the The Omen rip-off The Night Child, whose trailer pops up a lot of on exploitation trailer comps (spoiler: it's no good). But I have to say, Solange makes me more than curious about his other work (only The Night Child and his earlier Devil in the Flesh constitute horror), especially his poliziotteschi since the mystery in Solange is so solid. Here, he shows enough restraint during the murders that the film doesn't come off as lurid trash, and with a big assist from Ennio Morricone's score (with its great opening theme, posted for you below), he's actually able to pull off a poignant coda; a rare thing, indeed, for a giallo.

As I mentioned earlier, there usually isn't much aesthetically going on in these giallo/Krimi films, and Solange is no different. There are exceptions to be sure (anything by Bava, Argento, Martino), but the real joy and craft is in how well the filmmakers unfold their mystery and whether or not they can successfully pull the rug out from under the viewer. However, the look of Solange is surprisingly coherent, never getting in the way of the central mystery. It's surprising because the DP is non other than Aristide Massaccesi (better known to Americans as Joe D’Amato). This isn't the zoom-obsessed (although it is 1970's Italian cinema, so there are going to be zooms whether you like it or not) Massaccesi who would become the hack we love to rib on this blog; no, this was before the days of filling up his CV with crap like Emmanuel and the Last Cannibals, Papaya: Love Goddess of the Cannibals, Sexy Nights of the Living Dead, and Porno Holocaust. His camerawork here is more than serviceable, and it suggests the sort-of-capable filmmaker we would see in spurts in Beyond the Darkness and Anthropophagus (the only two films of his I've had anything positive to say about).

Perhaps the best part about Solange is that it's interested in all kinds of little details that move the mystery along. There are Red Herrings, to be sure, but they're quickly dealt with, as it really comes across as Dallamano and co. were sure not to insult the intelligence of the viewer (there's an interestingly self-aware line at the beginning of the film when Enrico says, “a suspicious wife is a very boring character," essentially eliminating his wife as a potential suspect) by paying more attention to the nuances of the mystery. This made me giddy, for it is a rare thing indeed for a giallo not to completely fall of the rails logically.

“If I’ve seen one giallo, I’ve seen them all” is a common sentiment among horror fans, and so as I wrap this post up I just want to throw my weight behind the film and urge those that think all gialli are the same to give this one a shot. Even for those that are squeamish and don't like Italian horror because of its penchant for the grotesque, really, with the exception of one gruesome looking x-ray and a flashback that is admittedly disturbing (although free of blood), Solange is light on gore, and contains one hell of a mystery. In fact, it's the rare '70s giallo that is more interested in its mystery than gruesomeness. See it; it's well worth your time.


Sunday, October 28, 2012

Italian Horror Blogathon: Anthropophagus (aka Antropophagus, Anthropophagous: The Beast, The Grim Reaper, Man Eater, The Savage Island)



Directed by the infamous Aristide Massaccesi (better known as Joe D’Amato, which is the name I will refer to throughout the rest of this piece) and containing a gleefully maniacal performance from Luigi Montefiori (better known as George Eastman; again, the name I will use throughout this piece), Anthropophagus is one of the most notorious Italian horror films. Unfortunately, it’s not very good. When one sees “Directed by Joe D’Amato” at the beginning of the film, the expectations drop, and everything from that point on becomes, “okay, that’s not so bad…I mean, it is Joe D’Amato.” Anthropophagus is no different. The film is excruciatingly boring, but for a Joe D’Amato film it’s nice that the film isn’t littered with awful sex scenes. There’s a lot of wandering around by the characters, but for a Joe D’Amato film, it’s nice that the characters are walking around surrounded by a moody atmosphere instead of spouting off horrid dialogue. Anthropophagus – despite its reputation as being one of the nastiest of the “Video Nasty” films – is quite tame throughout save for two scenes as it is more about tone than visceral gore. If there’s one thing I can say about Anthropophagus, it’s that at least old Joe is trying here. But even when the man is trying, his films are still chores to get through.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Italian Horror Blogathon: Absurd (AKA Rosso Sangue, Anthropophagus II, Monster Hunter, The Grim Reaper 2)





One of the more notorious “Video Nasty” films that never made it off of the final list of 39 films banned by the DPP, Absurd is a film – like most Joe D’Amato films – where the viewer is left to wonder what all the fuss was about. Nothing about the film is particularly scary or obscene, and even though it is essentially a beat for beat remake of the first two Halloween pictures, there’s nothing remotely artistic or well-made about the film that warrants disgust at the fact that it was banned in the UK.  It is, however, helmed by the infamous Artistide Massacessi – better known to us Yanks as Joe D’Amato – and for that it has obtained a level of cult status as being inherently nasty because his name is attached to it. Now, sitting down to watch a Joe D’Amato film isn’t something you do all willy-nilly. It has to be pre-meditated, and, if you’re anything like me, this is an act that shows your unbridled love and enthusiasm for the genre. Because let’s face it: why else would one subject themselves to a D’Amato film? So it’s with that that I find it difficult to get a bead on Absurd. In no way is it good, but in the right frame of mind, it’s more than tolerable.


Thursday, October 22, 2009

Italian Horror Blog-a-thon: Beyond the Darkness (aka Blue Holocaust, aka Final Darkness, aka Buried Alive)


Ah yes, Joe D’Amato…the man who gave us Porno Holocaust, a slew of Emmanuel movies, and the brilliantly titled Erotic Nights of the Living Dead. I couldn’t let a blog-a-thon about Italian horror go by without talking about the man who is probably the most famous of the hack Italian horror filmmakers. His real name is Aristide Massaccesi and he actually did one good thing in his career of 150+ movies: he hired a young up-and-coming assistant director named Michele Soavi and helped him write and finance his first feature, the wonderful giallo/slasher hybrid Stage Fright. His one good deed aside Massaccesi is a horrible director who is most famous for filming someone eating a fetus (not a real one, but people were convinced for a while – it was actually a skinned rabbit wrapped in bacon). In one of his early films – Beyond the Darkness – you see a filmmaker who is at least trying, and isn’t simply resorting to the hack tendencies of his colleagues Umberto Lenzi, Claudio Fragasso, Bruno Mattei, Jess Franco, and Ruggero Deadato.


The story kicks off on a familiar note as the sounds of Goblin pump through the speakers assuring us that at least one thing about this movie will be good…even if it sounds like recycled b-sides for their better soundtracks they composed for Argento. We meet Frankie a well-to-do 20-something who is on his way to pick up a baboon. The baboon serves no purpose except to show us that Frankie’s hobby is taxidermy. Yeah, there’s no doubt where this movie is going.

Well, Frankie’s girlfriend dies at the hands of some bad voodoo put into effect by Iris, an older woman who runs the manor that Frankie lives in (his parents, presumably, left it to him). See she wants his girlfriend out of the way so that she can have Frankie all for herself in an early demonstration of a cougar on the prowl. This movie was way ahead of its time. Frankie decides to dig up his girlfriend and inject her with new blood and body parts from victims he kills; random girls of course, and then the story just keeps getting weirder and more unnecessary. See…the whole taxidermy thing comes back into play. Brilliant!


Iris and Frankie fall in love and share some tender moments together; whether it’s her shoving her breast into his mouth in a weird psycho-sexual maternal gesture, or whether they’re hacking up victims together and melting their flesh off. It’s one big happy family:


Frankie decides he wants to keep his girlfriend’s body around, though, and in one of the films funniest scenes he seduces a girl who sprains her ankle running by his house. He invites her in – of course this is D’Amato we’re talking about so it doesn’t long before they engage in some awful soft-core banter – and the gettin’ busy commences. The only problem is that Frankie thought it would be a good idea to do it in the room where he has his girlfriend preserved in the bed right next to his.

This creates one of the films funniest shots. When the girl is horrified to see a corpse lying in the bed next to them, she (naturally) screams…so Frankie takes a bite out of her neck in a reference to the cannibalism themes that D’Amato has so often touched on. The only problem with it here is that it is completely out of nowhere. Essentially Frankie just, on a whim, decides what a great idea it would be to take a bite out of some poor girl’s neck. There’s no prior reference to his love of cannibalism and there’s no mention of it after the fact (except in an odd dinner scene that flashes between Iris burying body parts and Frankie eating a stew that looks rather suspicious).

In an odd twist to end the film the girlfriend’s twin sister shows up and Frankie gets all warm inside and begins to feel the way he used to before he started diggin’ older women. After he initially tells Iris he will marry her, he breaks it off at an odd family gathering, causing her to go crazy. The ending is all a blur because there’s nothing memorable about it.

This is your standard bad Italian horror film…and there are a lot of them, but it’s one of the charming things about this subgenre. Discovering tripe like this is fun because it’s not offensive tripe – it’s not a film that makes you feel like you completely wasted your time; rather, it’s the perfect example of the “so-bad-it’s-good” type movie where you can sit back with your friends, enjoy some adult beverages, and just have a good time watching a bad Italian horror flick. You get all the goodies you come to associate with this kind of Italian horror film: bad gore effects, a soundtrack that sounds like it has been recycled from a more popular film, bad dubbing, weird moments of eroticism that don’t work, hilariously bad dialogue, and of course a nonsensical plot that just makes you laugh at how inane it all is.

Now some people will argue that if a movie is bad then it’s not worth watching at all; that there is no such thing as a movie being “so-bad-it’s-good”. I see their point, but honestly sometimes I just want to watch something like Beyond the Darkness with my friends and laugh – I prefer these types of films to any kind of comedy released today, because these type of Italian horror movies made by hack directors elicit more genuine laughs than something like Step Brothers or The Brothers Solomon (okay, maybe not the best examples…but I caught them on Starz recently and they’ve been on my mind). Beyond the Darkness is not as fun as Virus (Mattei), Nightmare City (Lenzi), or Troll 2 (Fragassi); but it shows a director who is trying to make a decent movie and failing on so many levels because they just can’t leave their hack tendencies in the past.