
There is a general belief among fans of John Carpenter’s work that
In the Mouth of Madness is the American auteur’s last movie worth a damn. Allow me to get this out of the way: that’s so, so wrong. But before I get too far ahead of myself, let me finish my thought: There also seems to be a general belief that
In the Mouth of Madness is the best horror film Carpenter made since
The Thing. A few things: the first issue raised here saddens me because it seems that even many of Carpenter’s most ardent fans dismiss Carpenter’s 1987
Prince of Darkness, a film that is vastly superior to
In the Mouth of Madness, when mentioning the best horror films of Carpenter’s career. The second issue: I think that not just fans of Carpenter but the fans of the horror genre really, really overrate
In the Mouth of Madness. Oh, that’s not to say it isn’t a good horror film — and sometimes an even great horror film — it's just that the film doesn’t live up to the reputation given to it by its supporters. It’s a self-aware, postmodern horror film that isn’t even the best self-aware, postmodern horror film of the mid-90s (that would be
New Nightmare). But, it does show Carpenter, just as he did with
Prince of Darkness, dabbling in the
outré and making a horror film that, good or bad, goes for something different and certainly stands out as a stark contrast to his earlier horror films.